ntry-header

2021年6月10日,“第五届北大-清华统计论坛”在北京大学镜春园甲乙丙楼报告厅成功举办。北京大学、清华大学两校统计学科百余名师生参加了本次会议。北大-清华统计论坛是北大清华两校统计学科的传统学术活动,由北京大学统计科学中心和清华大学统计学研究中心联合发起,至今已成功举办五届。

北京大学统计科学中心主任姚方教授致开幕词

会议伊始,北京大学统计科学中心主任姚方教授致开幕词。姚方介绍了北大统计学科的发展历史与学科发展现状,回顾了两校统计学科紧密合作的深厚渊源,强调了北大-清华统计论坛的重要意义,并表达了对未来两校统计学科更加深入合作的美好愿景。

北京大学数学科学学院耿直教授作特邀报告
清华大学经济管理学院许宪春教授作特邀报告

随后是论坛的特邀报告环节。据悉,国际知名统计学家郁彬教授、刘军教授、林希虹教授、陈松蹊教授、周晓华教授、杨立坚教授、姚方教授、唐纳德·鲁宾教授(Donald Rubin)都曾作为特邀嘉宾出席论坛并作特邀报告。本届论坛的特邀报告嘉宾为北京大学数学科学学院耿直教授和清华大学经济管理学院许宪春教授。耿直教授是统计学领域因果推断方向的国际知名专家,本次报告围绕“因果网络局部学习与因果作用可识别性”展开。许宪春教授是清华大学中国经济社会数据研究中心主任,国家统计局原副局长、高级统计师,特邀报告的题目是“数据资产统计与核算问题研究”。

两校博士研究生进行口头汇报(从左到右、从上到下依次是黄昆、张心雨、金子捷、余博、胡文杰、周航、胡晓玉、朱珂)

海报展示与交流

海报展示与评选也是北大-清华统计论坛的经典环节,北大、清华两校的博士研究生们针对各自的研究成果进行口头汇报及海报展示,深入沟通交流。

北京大学姚方教授为优秀海报获奖者黄昆、张心雨同学颁奖

清华大学邓柯副教授为优秀海报获奖者胡晓玉、周航同学颁奖
北京大学耿直教授为优秀毕业生获奖者林颖倩同学颁奖
清华大学许宪春教授为优秀毕业生获奖者蒋斐宇同学颁奖

经过紧张激烈的评选,清华大学统计学研究中心17级博士研究生张心雨、18级博士研究生黄昆,北京大学数学科学学院16级博士研究生胡晓玉、17级博士研究生周航获评“优秀海报奖”,清华大学16级博士研究生蒋斐宇、北京大学16级博士研究生林颖倩获评本年度“优秀毕业生”称号。

参会师生合影
#post-12258
ntry-header

5月28-30日,“清华大学2021全国优秀大学生统计与数据科学交流会(暨优秀大学生夏令营)”活动成功举办。本次活动共收到来自全国99所高校的390份报名申请,经过层层筛选,来自清华大学、北京大学、北京师范大学、浙江大学、上海财经大学、西安交通大学等等多所国内知名高校的共43名同学通过线上线下结合的方式参加了此次活动。

申请者学校分布
申请者专业背景分布词云图
对申请人的专业背景进行统计发现,大部分同学本科所学专业为统计学、数学、金融、计算机等理工类相关学科,也有英语、语言管理、市场营销等专业的同学申请,这也符合统计学研究其交叉性强的特点。统计学研究领域包罗万象,优秀的统计学人才能利用多学科知识或跨学科背景为科学研究助力。
中心执行主任邓柯副教授

活动伊始,中心执行主任邓柯副教授简要介绍了清华大学统计学研究中心在学科建设、人才培养、学术成果等方面所取得的成绩。

随后,中心去年新入职的王天颖、张静怡、杨朋昆、胡志睿四位助理教授针对各自的研究方向进行了分享。

随后是对参加活动同学的考察环节,包括笔试和数据分析报告两个方面。数据分析环节两人一组“团战”,既考察了大家的专业技能,也考察了团队合作的能力。

中心李东副教授做活动总结
中心邓柯副教授为营员颁发证书

经过几轮的考察及评选,来自中国科学技术大学的张国宇等10名同学荣获“优秀营员”称号;西安交通大学的孔令杰等20名同学荣获“荣誉营员”称号。

附完整优秀营员及荣誉营员名单(排名不分先后):

优秀营员(10名):

张国宇、于浩洋、李易诚、史博文、应怀原、范歆远、杨亦宁、林子谦、孙弘毅、蔡乐衡

荣誉营员(20名):

孔令杰、甘伟烨、刘志涵、张灿睿、李艺康、王柏晴、刘程畅、江柔蓝、徐韬、刘原实、张至隆、戴一凡、杨至文、熊光智、周川、袁慧华、王若妍、尹嘉恒、汪奕晨、张煜

#post-12257
ntry-header

为响应国家对高等教育改革的号召、促进后疫情时代的统计学教育适应社会发展的最新需求,基于2019年“第一届统计学教学改革研讨会”的讨论,清华大学统计学研究中心将于2021年6月25-26日举办“第二届统计学教学改革研讨会”,同从事一线教学的各位统计学者立足教学理念、教学体系、培养模式、教学方式四个维度,进行进一步深化探讨,欢迎各位老师报名参加!

【会议地点】:清华大学校内或附近

【会议时间】:2021/06/26  (周六)

【报到时间】:2021/06/25(周五)

【报名日期】:即日起至2021/06/15

【联系人】:

王江典:wangjiangdian@tsinghua.edu.cn

报名可发送“姓名、单位、教学课程、联系方式”至王江典老师邮箱。

#post-12248
ntry-header

自2016年来,北京大学、清华大学两校优秀的统计学师生济济一堂,发挥两校的学科优势,互通有无,着力推动中国优秀统计青年人才的成长,助力中国统计学学科的发展。为传承兄弟院校间的团结协作和友好交流,两校将于2021年6月10日举办第五届北大-清华统计论坛。

会议时间:2021年6月10日 下午1:00-5:00

会议地点:北京大学镜春园82号院甲乙丙楼报告厅(二层东侧)

主办方:北京大学统计科学中心  清华大学统计学研究中心

会议报名:

报名时间:即日起至2021年5月15日

报名链接:https://docs.qq.com/form/page/DWmhOWHRCZVdxQUli#/fill

特邀报告

北京大学 耿直教授
北京大学数学科学学院教授
北京生物医学统计与数据管理研究会理事长
中国人工智能学会不确定性人工智能专委会副主任

 

清华大学 许宪春教授
清华大学经济管理学院教授
清华大学中国经济社会数据研究中心主任
国家统计局原副局长、高级统计师
清华大学中国经济社会数据研究中心主任
国家统计局原副局长、高级统计师

 

会议议程:

时间 议程
13:00-13:30 报到
13:30-13:40 开幕式
13:40-14:40 大会报告一(耿直教授)
14:40-15:00 茶歇&合影
15:00-16:00 大会报告二(许宪春教授)
#post-12242
ntry-header

Talking with Great Minds—Howell Tong

Keywords: International view   Broad-minded   Practical need  Leadership

Prof. Tong in Tsinghua
  1. Childhood and study experience oversea.

Q: Can you talk about your childhood?

A: In my childhood, my family and I were faced with general tough life conditions, but eventually we went through the hardship and became stronger. I am also very lucky that I always have good teachers. One of the teachers that I remember particularly once told us a story about Hua Luogeng when I was very young. That was the time Hua Luogeng returned to China. My teacher told me how he became famous after studying, and that actually made a quite impression on me. I think it’s because of his story that I decided to study Mathematics. I moved to England in 1961 when my father worked there. The secondary school I attended was not a top school, but was very comprehensive. Under the support of the school and headmaster, I picked up English quickly. I was the only boy from that school who went to a university.

Q: In that period, did you encounter any challenge in your study or life?

A: Yes. First of all, I need to get used to the English way of schooling, for example moving across different classrooms to have lessons, and different dietary habit on campus. But luckily the students around were all very nice, and we became good friends. Because of this experience, I was able to know different culture and their way of speaking. It’s quite a big challenge to adapt from the Hong Kong school system to a working class environment in London at that time.

Q: Is there any particular reason that you choose Statistics as your major?

A: Well as I said I decided to study Mathematics, and I graduated in Mathematics in Manchester. We had good statistics teachers and received many statistics courses, which was unusual at that time in England. I also got a chance to listen to a lecture about probability theory given by an eminent probability researcher. I was impressed by his lecture and became interested in probability theory. Because of my family, I decided to suspend the post-graduate study and took a job. During that time, I started to read some papers, and I came across one paper about time series by my former teacher in Manchester. That’s how I became interested in time series. I wrote to him and went back to Manchester. Due to some reasons, I accidentally became a university teacher teaching statistics instead of a post-graduate student. I was very lucky.

  1. Early career as a statistician.

Q: How did you finally decide to become a statistics researcher?

A: Once I returned to Manchester, I became quite clear that statistics is the career I want to pursue. Thanks to my school, I had an opportunity to meet with other scientists and technologists, and became interested in control engineering and stochastic control. So, time series became quite a natural subject for me. My early career was mainly oriented in frequency domain, and I changed to time domain later on when I met Akaike. He visited us in Manchester for half a year, working on multivariate control system using multivariate linear AR model, as well as some aspect of AIC(Akaike Information Criterion). We became very good friends, and I wanted to learn more from him, so I applied a Royal Society Japan Fellowship, and went to japan for 6 months. During that visit, I read a number of papers he collected, and learned a lot from not only the papers, but also the marks and personal notes he made. It was very valuable for me. By talking to him, I learned the background of why he did certain research. He did research not in front of the desk, but went out and met other scientists. He did not publish many papers in the first ten years of his career, but did a lot of great works later. He spent time cultivating friendship with engineers and other people. Because of this, he was asked to solve a problem of selecting a suitable model from a number of models in the field of predicting. That’s the original problem behind AIC. So, I got a deep understanding of the whole idea of his research besides reading papers.

Q: We know that you published many great papers in your early career, so what’s your secret for this fantastic achievements?

A: I remember the words of Mr. Yang Zhenning. He said do something that you are really passionate about. My father never interfered in my study, and I never interfered in my children’s career either. Let the person choose what he or she is really interested in. My mentor is a time series analyst, but he never pushed me, so I had the chance to choose my own area. The reason why I choose statistics is because I want to produce something new, so I am lucky to be in the right environment where there is no pressure. I am also very lucky to have a good wife taking care of my family, and lucky to have the chance meeting with other scientists. I am a good learner, and I am able to pick up the things I want to learn. I think passion is very important rather than any secret. Remember to be observant and passionate.

  1. About the threshold model

Q: Now let’s talk about one of your most important work in non-linear time series, the threshold model. Where did the idea come from?

A: When I was visiting Akaike, I learned the way he produced the spectral density estimate. So, I used the approach on the lynx data, which I was very interested in. There was a session in the Royal Statistic Society and I presented this paper. During that discussion, there was one gentleman who made a very, very important comment. He said that the data is cyclical, but the cycle is not symmetric. The lynx population would rise slowly but fall rapidly. If you use a linear Gaussian model, you would never be able to capture it. Also, he said that from the point view of dynamical system, the cycle should be considered limit cycle. So, if you can produce a model that leads to limit cycle, it would be ideal. And David Cox and Akaike also made some similar comments. However, it is very difficult and is a big challenge.So, I decided to work on the problem. But my entire education up to that time was all in linear. So, I need to teach myself nonlinear dynamical systems.

Then, one day I was in my garden and mowing the lawn. When you mow the lawn, you go strip by strip. Suddenly, the idea of piecewise linearity came into my mind. This is because I was subconsciously thinking of the problem all the time.

Then I started working on the idea and a student did programs. One day she brought me some results which were too perfectly periodic to be possible. Then I found that she forgot the noise. This was the first time I saw limit cycle. Then, I said we could also see whether this model can produce other nonlinear phenomena, such as subharmonics, higher harmonics, amplitude-frequency dependency and so on. And it turned out that the model could do that.

Q: Did you encounter difficult times with the model?

A: Yes. A lot of people discussed the paper but I could not say everybody liked it, maybe because the idea was so new. I also got one or two people attacking. The model was invented in 1980s but has remained fairly quiet for 10 years. It was in about the 1990s that the model attracted a lot of attention. So, the beginning was not easy.

Q: From your experience, how to find a good research problem?

A: First of all, you have to be social. To me, statisticians are toolmakers. What tool you want to invent must be dictated by practical needs from people on the ground. So, we should go out, interact and collaborate with other scientists. We should be members of scientific teams. Don’t follow fashion blindly. I never want to follow fashion. When I did nonlinear time series, almost none of the leaders in time series worked on that.

There are probably two types of research. One is the run-of-mill research, which means you have an incremental improvement. Those things do not take us long and you can publish these very quickly. The other one is the revolutionary research. Of course, in one’s lifetime, one would probably not have more than a couple of such revolutions. But you must always keep them in mind, work on them in any spare time.

  1. About the leadership

Q: You have been Chair of Statistics at several universities. How can you do good jobs in both academic and management? What’s your secret?

A: I adopted the principle I learned from Lao Tzu (老子) and Sun Tzu’s “Art of War” (孙子兵法). I cannot micromanage, so if there is any big job I will identify a suitable person. Then I will give the person my full support. So if you use one person you need to trust him (用人不疑,疑人不用).

  1. About statistics in the future

Q: Do you worry about the future of statistics given the competition from Machine Learning and AI?

A: As Lao Tzu has said, behind every good fortune there is a misfortune, and misfortune leads to good fortune (祸兮福之所倚,福兮祸之所伏). I think the two aspects are certainly true for what challenge statistics is facing in the domain of data science. But if we sensibly steer our ship of statistics, we can benefit. Machine learning is certainly a powerful tool, but some of the ideas are not unknown or uncommon in statistics. Because in statistics, the basic training is how to handle randomness, and for anything that requires that, statistics has advantages. But on the other hand, we have to be fully prepared and liberate our minds. Some of the old ideas may be too restrictive. We used to deal with small data set in days of Fisher, but now we have to deal with large data sets. To defeat the new challenge, we have to adopt the attitude in Chinese culture: when foreigners come, we absorb them.

So, I don’t worry. As long as we are broad-minded and ready to adapt, we can survive and grow.

 

#post-12226
ntry-header

2020年12月27-29日,“世界华人数学家联盟年会”在安徽合肥举行,清华大学统计学研究中心邓柯副教授作为第一作者的学术论文“On the unsupervised analysis of domain-specific Chinese texts”荣获“2020世界华人数学家联盟最佳论文奖-银奖”。该论文是邓柯副教授与美国哈佛大学Peter Bol教授、哈佛大学刘军教授和萨福克大学李佳漪副教授共同完成,论文发表于美国科学院院刊PNAS杂志。

文章提出运用统计学模型和原理进行无指导中文文本分析的新方法-TopWORDS,可对特定领域中文文本进行词语发现和中文分词。此方法还可以结合其他文本分析工具,如词嵌入、主题模型、关联规则挖掘等,可提取文本中的主要特征和信息,是中文文本挖掘领域的重要突破。

丘成桐先生(右)和林勇教授(左)给邓柯副教授颁奖​

 

#post-12224
ntry-header

近日,“清华大学第九届青年教师教学大赛”(简称“青教赛”)落下帷幕,我中心邓婉璐老师荣获“清华大学第九届青年教师教学大赛”(理科、医科组)一等奖;周在莹老师荣获“清华大学第九届青年教师教学大赛”(理科、医科组)二等奖。

据悉,全校共有47个院系的140名青年教师参加了清华大学第九届青年教师教学大赛的培训和比赛。赛前进行了2个月的教学培训,从教学内容、教学方法、教案写作等全方位对青年教师进行了教学培训,之后组织了10次教学工作坊进行交流。

全国第五届青年教师教学大赛暨清华大学第九届青年教师教学大赛总结交流座谈会在上周召开,副校长郑力,校务委员会副主任、工会主席王岩出席座谈会,副教务长、教务处处长曾嵘主持会议。

郑力副校长出席总结交流座谈会

郑力向在国赛和校赛上取得优异成绩的青年教师表示祝贺。郑力回顾了青教赛的发展历程,对指导教师团队的工作表示肯定。他指出,青教赛是一个学习的盛会,在备赛、参赛的过程中,青年教师通过指导教师的辅导、选手之间的交流提高了教学能力和水平;青教赛是一个创作的盛会,参赛选手不断突破自我、追求卓越,提升了专业素养;青教赛是一个传承的盛会,青年教师在指导教师的言传身教下迅速成长,将学习到的教学技能应用到课堂上,将学校教书育人的优良传统和经验一代代传承下去。

邓婉璐老师(下排中)在座谈会发言
       座谈会上,获奖教师踊跃发言,分享了自己参赛的感悟与收获。大家认为,竞赛活动的引导性极强,备赛以及参赛的过程为今后的教学生涯积累了宝贵经验。比赛时评委提出的意见客观、全面、准确,指出了教学过程的一些细节问题,让青年教师更好地理解课程的学科思维特点、发展方向、理念及核心价值,明确了未来努力的方向。

座谈会现场

图文|清华新闻网

#post-12221
ntry-header

11月27日,清华大学举行抗击新冠肺炎疫情表彰大会。地球系统科学系宫鹏教授、徐冰教授领衔的“流行病学传播预测与对策”科技抗疫突击队荣获“清华大学抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进集体”荣誉称号。我中心执行主任邓柯副教授、侯琳副教授及中心博士生刘朝阳、沈翀、王掣、宋爽、余博作为突击队骨干成员,共同出席表彰大会接受表彰。

宫鹏教授(后排左五)、邓柯副教授(前排左四)、侯琳副教授(前排右一)及突击队师生荣获表彰
#post-12215
ntry-header

蒋斐宇,清华大学统计学研究中心五年级博士生,指导老师为李东副教授。主要研究方向为非线性时间序列分析、金融计量学和变点检测等。目前已在Journal of Econometrics, Statistica Sinica等期刊发表多篇学术论文。
学术经历:
2018/09-2018/11:香港大学访问
2019/03-2019/08:香港大学访问
2019/08-2020/08:伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校(UIUC)访问
社会工作经历:
2018/09-2019/08:清华大学统计学研究中心学生会主席
2018/09-2019/01:清华大学统计咨询中心学生咨询师

近日,我中心16级博士研究生蒋斐宇同学荣获“2020年度研究生国家奖学金”,统计学研究中心专访小分队骨干成员陶宇心、余成两位同学针对同学们关心的论文、科研、职业生涯规划等问题对蒋斐宇深度采访:
Q1:师兄您好!非常感谢您接受此次采访。首先想请问您对于这次获得国家奖学金有什么样的个人感受呢?
蒋:非常荣幸这次能获得国家奖学金。感谢统计中心和工业工程系这几年的培养和支持。其实挺惭愧的,我在读博期间并没有很多社工经历或社会实践,此次能获得国奖是对我科研成果极大的肯定。特别感谢我的导师——李东老师的教导和帮助。
Q2:师兄在读博期间,有哪些印象深刻的记忆呢?
蒋:印象最深刻的事情,应该是我在香港访问的时候,当时我和我的导师参加了一个学术会议,晚上在酒店里收到了通知,我和导师合作的文章被Journal of Econometrics接收了。这是我的第一篇文章被接收,还是非常激动的。
Q3:师兄在过去几年里连续发表了多篇顶刊,想问下师兄在科研方面有什么心得体会吗?
蒋:不算顶刊,只是还不错的期刊吧(笑)。我觉得有以下几点:首先是打好理论功底,不要急功近利。这可能跟我的研究方向有关,我的研究方向偏理论研究,需要扎实的理论基础。所以在导师的建议下,我博士一年级主要在上课,没有做研究。并且上课不能只做老师布置的题,书上其他的题目,以及老师推荐的参考书,都是非常好的,有余力的话可以都尝试做做。有些知识点可能目前课程不需要学,但在未来研究中有可能会用到,需要自己多阅读多学习。熟悉了各种数学、统计工具后,就能很容易看懂别人的文章,自己做研究也比较快了。
除了打好数学基础以外,写作能力和英语水平也非常重要。有的时候把一个故事讲好是很困难的,需要讲清楚你提出了什么问题、前人有哪些工作、存在什么问题、你的解决方法等。论文构思和框架是有技巧的,其中introduction部分最关键,很考验写作功底,需要循序渐进、吸引读者。
在论文写作中,证明部分首先自己必须全部搞懂,不能依葫芦画瓢、一知半解。与其之后被老师、审稿人发现问题,不如自己先保证每一步证明的准确。另外要学会如何提升自己论文的档次,怎么充实文章。在数理统计领域,有可能审稿的周期会很久,被拒绝也是经常会发生的。大家不能气馁,对于审稿人中肯的意见,要吸收进去。
Q4:之前师兄曾前往UIUC交流访问一年,并短时间出色完成了一篇与疫情相关的文章Time series analysis of COVID-19 infection curve: A change-point perspective发表在JOE上,想问下师兄如何在短时间内完成这篇文章的呢?
蒋:这肯定有运气成分在(笑)。这是我和访问的老师一起完成的文章,和变点有关。很巧的是我们在疫情爆发前就在进行时间序列变点估计的相关研究,证明部分也已差不多完成。到今年3、4月份,美国疫情开始严重,COVID问题很受统计学者的关注。我当时就想,能不能把我们变点估计的方法用在疫情数据上。和老师讨论后,我便尝试用时间序列模型去分析疫情数据,花了两周时间做了下模拟,发现估计的变点和实际事件很有关联,比如超级传播者的确诊、政府发布stay at home政策的时间点等等。所以很幸运,恰好有个贴合实际的问题,也恰好有证明好的方法。
现有关于疫情分析的研究一般是基于传染病模型,有协变量和许多假设。而我们的方法属于时间序列,纯数据驱动,没有协变量,单纯利用疫情数据寻找变点、进行预测。结果发现预测效果和其他模型差不多,甚至更好。因此研究问题的动机很重要,统计问题是从实际问题出发的。现在流行的机器学习、深度学习等方法一般需要大量的数据,对于像疫情这种观测的数据点适中的实际例子来说,统计模型往往更适用。可见即使是时间序列这种非常经典的统计方向在大数据时代也是很有必要的。
Q5:师兄还有一年就要毕业了,对于未来有何规划和打算呢?
蒋:我之前就打算去学界,现在正在找教职,因为考虑到业界工作会有KPI和ddl等,而学术界相比之下约束较少,学术和生活上相对比较自由。当然工业界的研究问题更切合实际和偏商业化,薪资往往会更高,这个就看个人选择了。
周围有许多同学对未来的规划尚不明确,我的建议是先写出一篇文章,达到毕业要求后,在导师同意下,可以在博士二年级末三年级初去企业实习一段时间,体验一下业界适不适合自己。最晚在四年级上的时候就要做出明确选择了,以便之后能够专攻某一方向。
此外,统计咨询也是一个接触各种项目的很好的机会。我们在博二会上统计咨询课,考核标准就是完成一到两个统计咨询项目,项目来自于企业、政府部门、学校其他院系的课题组等等。毕竟统计学是基于应用的,不是象牙塔,需要和实际问题结合。我们有和其他专业的同学合作过,如果能利用统计学的方法帮助别人解决困扰多年的问题,别人会非常感谢,自己也会很自豪。这相当于推动了多个领域的学术发展和科研进步,是很有意义的事情。
Q6:最后,想问下师兄对于统计中心和师弟师妹们有什么寄语和期望吗?
蒋:首先祝愿统计中心越办越好,能够尽早建系。在招了本科生后,师弟师妹们做助教的压力可能会大一些,希望大家加油干,这也是为清华统计学科的建设做贡献。
另外,不是自己领域的课和讲座也可以多听听,多和别人交流。有些想法即使现在用不到,也有可能会启发自己未来的科研。一个人精力是有限的,自己看论文不如直接听别人讲座来的高效。高年级同学也可以多出去参加会议,和同龄的同学、老师们交流沟通。陶宇心、余成:非常感谢师兄在百忙之中抽空接受采访,衷心祝愿师兄在统计学的道路上继续乘风破浪,万事胜意!
#post-12208
ntry-header

日前,我中心执行主任邓柯副教授被清华大学教务处及研究生院共同聘请为“清华大学教学顾问组成员”,聘期3年。此前,由邓柯副教授带领的统计咨询中心团队曾受清华大学教学质量评估中心的委托,针对学校教学评估系统优化给出专业指导建议。团队高质量的咨询服务及专业化的优化方案受到学校教务处及教学质量评估中心的高度肯定,并将相关方案成功应用到教学评估系统的整体升级工作中。

清华大学教务处处长曾嵘为邓柯副教授颁发聘书

项目背景:

教学评估是衡量教师教学质量的重要手段,可为教师的考核、奖励和晋升提供关键依据。清华大学从1998年秋开始“课堂教学质量学生问卷调查”工作,2004年开始实行网上评估,已经连续开展了22年。为了保证结果的科学性和有效性,教学评估系统经过多次升级,不断完善评价体系和方法。

从2019年5月开始,统计咨询中心接受清华大学教学质量评估中心的委托,对现有教学评估系统的计算方法和程序代码进行解析和优化,以提高评估系统的计算稳定性和计算效率。

解决方案:

咨询中心团队在深入分析研究当前算法、代码和评估结果的基础上,锁定了影响评估系统计算稳定性的关键因素,并基于统计学原理对原算法中部分不合理的模块进行了调整和重构。经实践验证,调整后的评估系统计算稳定性和计算效率均得到了大幅度提高,成功解决了长期困扰教学评估系统有效运转的关键问题。相关成果为清华教学评估工作提供了更为可靠的理论方法和计算框架,并为教学评估体系的进一步完善打下了坚实的基础。

#post-12194